股骨头坏死治疗仪对股骨头坏死患者骨结构修复及髋关节功能的影响  

Effects of therapeutic instrument of necrosis of femoral head on bone structure repair and hip-joint function in patients with necrosis of femoral head

作　　者：郎凤萍[1] 黄宏[1] 黄辉[1] 黄永勋[1] 郝秀珍[1] 黄克勤（指导）[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国北京皇城股骨头坏死专科医院,102200

出　　处：《世界中医骨科杂志》2005年第2期153-157,52,共6页World Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthoprdics

摘　　要：目的：探讨股骨头坏死治疗仪对股骨头坏死患者髋关节功能及骨结构修复的影响。方法：2000—01／2002—12随机抽取股骨头坏死患者90例，治疗组60例采用股骨头坏死治疗仪配合口服中药治疗，对照组30例单纯口服中药治疗。评估两组患者治疗前后的髋关节疼痛评分、生活能力评分，髋关节活动度评分，行走距离评分。结果：髋关节疼痛评分治疗前治疗组为（15．47±3．25）分，治疗后为（26．80±6．56）分，对照组治疗前为（15．20±4．38）分，治疗后为（28．00±6．21）分，两组治疗前后差异均有显著性意义（t=12．30，8．35，P〈0．01）。生活能力评分治疗组治疗前为（11．75±2．73）分，治疗后为（18．17±3．44）分，对照组治疗前为（10．00±4．38）分，治疗后为（28．00±6．21）分，两组治疗前后比较差异均有显著性意义（t=25．17，8．35，P〈0．01）。髋关节活动度评分治疗组治疗前为（9．67±2．88）分，治疗后为（13．87±3．57）分，对照组治疗前为（8．80±3．04）分，治疗后为（12．13：t3．23）分，两组治疗前后比较，差异有显著性意义（t=24．24，5．76，P〈O．01）。行走距离评分治疗组治疗前为（6．80-a：1．73）分，治疗后为（10．25~1．66）分，对照组治疗前为（5．10-a：1．79）分，治疗后为（8．90也．78）分，两组治疗前后比较差异有显著性意义（t=32．91，6．67，P〈O．01）。结论：“股骨头坏死治疗仪”对股骨头坏死患者的髋关节疼痛、髋关节活动度、行走距离均有切实的改善作用。Aim： The paper is aimed to probe into the effects of therapeutic instrument of necrosis of femoral head on hip-joint function and bone structure repair in patients with necrosis of femoral head. Methods： Ninety patients with necrosis of femoral head, randomly chosen from January 2000 to December 2002,were divided into treatment group （n=60） and control group （n=30）. Patients in the treatment group re-ceived the treatment of therapeutic instrument of necrosis of femoral head combined with oral traditional Chinese medicine. Those in the control group received the treatment Chinese medicine. The scores of the patients in the two groups were evaluated on the pain of hip joint, living ability, territory of hip joint, and walking distance before and after treatment separately. Results： The scores of the pain of hip joint in the treatment group were 15.47±3.25 and 26.80±6.56 before and after treatment respectively; those in the control group were 15.20±4.38 and 28.00±6.21befoer and after treatment respectively; there was significant difference in the two groups before and after treatment （t=12.30, 8.35, P〈0.01）. The scores of living ability in the treatment were 11.75±2.73 and 18.17±3.44 before and after the treatment respectively; those in the control group were 10.00±4.38 and 28.00±21 before and after treatment; there was significant difference in the two groups before and after treatment （t=25.17, 8.35, P〈0.01）. The scores of territory of hip joint in the treatment group were 9.67±2.88 and 13.87±3.57 before and after treatment respectively; those in the control group were 8.80±3.04 and 12.13 ±3.23 respectively, there was signify-cant difference in the two groups before and after treatment （t=24.24, 5.76, P〈0.01）. The scores of walking distance were 6.80±1.73 and 10.25±1.66 respectively; those in the control group were 5.10±1.79 and 8.90±2.78 respectively, there was significant meaning in the two groups before and after treatment （t=32.91, 6.67, P〈0.01）. Conclusion

关 键 词：股骨头坏死 治疗仪 修复 骨结构 髋关节功能 

分 类 号：R681.8[医药卫生—骨科学]