膨胀式与球囊式椎体成形器临床应用比较  

A COMPARISON OF CLINICAL APPLICATION OF EXPANDING AND SACCULE VERTEBRAL-BODY PLASTIC DEVICES

作　　者：吕宝荣 叶红明[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江省中医医院,杭州310006 [2]浙江中医药大学

出　　处：《中医正骨》2006年第5期17-18,共2页The Journal of Traditional Chinese Orthopedics and Traumatology

摘　　要：为比较球囊式与膨胀式椎体成形器在临床中的应用效果,将37例脊柱压缩性骨折患者随机分为两组,在DSA导引下分别行球囊式及膨胀式经皮椎体成形术治疗,对两种方法治疗后疼痛缓解情况和椎体高度恢复率进行比较。结果膨胀组与球囊组病例术后均有不同程度疼痛缓解或消失,膨胀组在VSA及术后椎体高度恢复上优于球囊组,疼痛疗效比例相当。表明两组在经皮椎体成形术中有着不同的优势,应将两者结合,探索出更为安全有效的治疗途径。In order to compare the clinical application results of expanding and saccule vertebral-body plastic devices,37 cases of spinal compression fracture were randomly divided into two groups,which were treated under DSA leading by the expanding plasty(EP) and by the saccule one(SP),respectively and the post-treatment painful remissions and vertebral-body height recovery rates of the two groups were compared.The results showed that after the operations,the pains of both groups were remitted or disappeared in varied degrees;the EP group had an advantage over the SP group in VSA and post-operative vertebral-body height recovery;the two groups obtained the equivalent therapeutic-effect ratios on the pains,suggesting that both groups have their own varied advantages in percutaneous vertebral-body plasty;the two methods should be combined in order to seek for the more effective and safe therapeutic way.

关 键 词：压缩性骨折/治疗 椎体成形术 球囊成形 膨胀成形 骨水泥 临床研究 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]