检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宁泽群[1]
出 处:《旅游学刊》2006年第5期80-85,共6页Tourism Tribune
摘 要:我国旅行社市场的恶性竞争,一直是旅游学界十分关注的研究领域。许多研究者认为,这是旅行社市场门槛过低,使得企业数量进入过度造成。但是本文研究发现,旅行社市场存在一个进入的悖论,即市场的企业进入与盈利水平呈反向变动的趋势。这种市场进入与盈利的变动趋势,不符合市场竞争的一般规律。经过研究,本文提出一个旅行社企业的定价模型,作者称之为“套中套黑箱定价”模型。通过这个定价模型,我们可以比较合理地解释旅行社市场存在的这种市场悖论现象,并揭示了旅行社市场表面竞争,实际上仍然属于垄断的事实,而这种垄断造成了对社会福利的损害。The cutthroat competition in China's travel service market has always been a noticeable research area among tourism circle. Many researchers hold the view that this phenomenon results from easy access into travel service market. However,this study finds that there exists a paradox of market access into travel service market;i. e., a trend of reverse change between market access and profit level. This trend does not conform with the regulation of market competition. After study,the paper puts forward a price-fixing model for travel service enterprises, called by the author as Black-Box Pricing Pattern. Through this model, we can more reasonably explain this kind of phenomenon. It discloses that the superficial competition in travel service market is in essence a kind of monopoly, which will bring about damage to social benefit.
关 键 词:旅行社 市场进入 “套中套黑箱定价”模型
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145