转轨经济法学:西方范式与中国现实之抉择  

The Transitional Economic Law:A Choice Between Western Paradigm and China’s Reality

作　　者：陈云良[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《现代法学》2006年第3期174-181,共8页Modern Law Science

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"当代中国转型期的法律与社会研究"(04BFX005);2005年湖南省社科基金"百人工程"课题"经济法下的谨慎政府"(05BR09)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：当下中国经济法学的逻辑假设建立在西方经济法范式的基础之上,无法与中国现实达成和谐。提出“转轨经济法学”的概念可以使中国的经济法学研究回归到转轨中国的社会现实中来,解决改革现实中的真问题,自觉区别于西方范式,消解中国经济法学严重的正当性危机。转轨经济法的历史使命不是要通过政府来弥补市场缺陷而是要培育市场;转轨经济法的核心任务是反行政干预而不是反垄断;转轨经济法的基本功能是控权而不是授权;转轨经济法应以公平为第一价值取向。The present logic of China＇s economic law is based on the paradigm of western economic law, which fails to accord with real life in China. Advocating ＂transitional economic law＂ may turn the study of China＇s economic law back to social realities in China, so as to settle down problems arising out of or pertaining to China＇s reform. This differs from the western paradigm as it passes through the crisis of the justification of China＇s economic law. The historic mission of ＂transitional economic law＂ is to cultivate markets＇ rather than cure market defects by way of governmental interference. The heavy task of ＂transitional economic law＂ runs against administrative interference rather than anti-trust. The basic function of ＂transitional economic law＂ is to control power rather than vest power. Fairness and justice is given a top value in ＂transitional economic law. ＂

关 键 词：转轨经济法学 西方范式 中国现实 

分 类 号：D922.29[政治法律—经济法学]