检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《南方医科大学学报》2006年第5期680-682,共3页Journal of Southern Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨磨痂术配合生物敷料A治疗四肢深II度烧伤的临床效果。方法将73例四肢深II度烧伤患者按创面处理方式分组,32例为磨痂术配合生物敷料A治疗组,41例为传统治疗对照组,观察两组病人的白细胞计数、体温、创面感染及愈合时间等。结果磨痂组与对照组比较,磨痂术配合生物敷料A处理创面可明显提高四肢深II度烧伤有效率(29/32vs31/41,P<0.05),全身炎症反应轻,创面愈合时间缩短(13.79±5.72vs17.08±8.39,P<0.01),瘢痕增生不明显。结论磨痂术配合生物敷料A是治疗四肢深II度烧伤创面较理想的方法,早期进行更佳,但对手部偏深的深II度烧伤仍不能完全替代早期削痂植皮术。Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of eschar grinding and wound coverage by biological dressing A in the management of deep partial-thickness bum wound on the extremities. Methods Seventy-three patients with deep partialthickness bums on the extremities were divided into two groups to receive different managements. The patients in group 1 were treated with eschar grinding and wound coverage with biological dressing A, and group 2 received conventional treatment. The white blood cell count, body temperature, incidence of wound infection and wound healing time were observed. Results Compared with conventional treatment, wound management with eschar grinding and coverage by biological dressing A could increase the effective rate (29/32 vs 31/41, P〈0.05), inhibit systemic inflammation and scar hypertrophy, and shorten the wound healing time (13.79±5.72 va 17.08±8.39, P〈0.01). Conclusion Eschar grinding and wound coverage by biological dressing A can be effective for management of deep partial-thickness bums on the extremities, and earlier treatment with the dressing A achieves better effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.116