检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵小斐[1] 李冬梅[1] 孟新科[1] 何满红[1] 王雪梅[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市急救医疗中心,518035
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2006年第6期21-22,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的探讨“序贯评估病情”指导脑卒中急救护理程序的临床意义。方法以138例脑卒中患者为研究组,实施“序贯评估病情”指导院前急救护理程序,回顾207例实施常规护理程序的患者为对照组。比较两组患者从呼救到接受专科治疗的时间、患者的病死率及痊愈率。结果研究组患者从呼救到接受专科治疗的时间为(48.9±34.1)min,明显短于对照组的(73.1±46.7)min;病死率为11.1%,明显低于对照组的24.3%;痊愈率为34.7%,明显高于对照组的26.9%。结论“序贯评估病情”指导院前急救护理的方法,明显缩短了脑卒中患者整体急救的时间,是一个值得推广的院前急救护理程序和方法。Objective To explore the clinic value of sequential severity evaluation in emergency nursing for stroke patients. Methods 138 of stroke patients were enrolled in study group, which completed sequential severity evaluation in emergency medical and nursing provision drawn up according to the results. Another 207 of stroke patients were enrolled in control group, which emergency nursing provision drawn up according to general procedure. Length of time from emergency call to special therapeutic, mortality compared between the two groups respectively. Results In study group, length of time from emergency call to special therapeutic (48.9±34.1) min was significantly shorter than that of control group (73.1 ±46.7) min; mortality (11. 196) was significantly lower than that of control group (24.3 96 ), cure rate (34.7 96 ) was significantly higher than that of control group (26.9 96 ). Condusion Sequential severity evaluation in acute nursing may be a worthy procedure for proving reaction ability of nurse reaction ability in emergency medical and nursing, proving outcome for stroke patients and it should be commended.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74