检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦之威[1] 孙磊[2] 陈晓亮[3] 张杰峰[1] 夏波[1]
机构地区:[1]泰安市中心医院骨科,山东271000 [2]中国人民解放军第88医院骨科 [3]青岛大学青岛医学院附属医院骨科,青岛266003
出 处:《中国矫形外科杂志》2006年第11期821-824,共4页Orthopedic Journal of China
摘 要:[目的]通过对82例腰椎滑脱症手术治疗病人的回顾性临床分析,探讨有关腰椎滑脱症的手术适应证、术式选择及治疗效果。[方法]依据病人情况分别采取以下4种术式:A组,后路单纯植骨融合术18例,均Ⅰ度滑脱;B组,椎弓根钉固定复位椎板间植骨融合术31例,Ⅰ度11例,Ⅱ度20例;C组,减压、椎弓根钉固定复位横突间植骨融合术19例,Ⅰ度2例,Ⅱ度13例,Ⅲ度4例,包括椎间盘突出3例,椎管狭窄3例;D组,减压、椎间融合、椎弓根钉固定复位横突间植骨融合术14例,Ⅰ度1例,Ⅱ度10例,Ⅲ度3例,包括椎管狭窄6例(Ⅰ度1例、Ⅱ度4例、Ⅲ度1例),椎间盘突出4例(Ⅱ度3例、Ⅲ度1例)。[结果]随访6个月~6a 6个月,平均3a8个月,单纯植骨融合组(A组)18例中15例融合,其融合率83%、滑脱复位率0.03%,根据下腰痛的FRS评分标准,其改善率52.69%。椎弓根钉固定复位椎板间植骨融合(B组)的31例中30例融合,其融合率96%,滑脱复位率83%,改善率56.20%。减压、椎弓根钉固定复位横突间植骨融合组(C组)融合率89%、滑脱复位率90%、改善率59.85%。减压、椎间融合、椎弓根钉固定复位横突间植骨融合组(D组)融合率100%、滑脱复位率92%、改善率61.08%。[结论]不同的手术方式针对不同的手术适应证。手术方式的不同因病人的病情不同而不同。[ Objective] Through the analysis of 82 cases of spondylolisthesis treated with surgery, the different types of surgical procedures were evaluated. [ Method] Patients with spondylolisthesis were divided into 4 groups based on their pathology and different surgical procedures were used accordingly. Group Ⅰ consisted of 18 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis with back pain (3 cases) and isthmic spondylolisthesis (13 cases) and traumatic spondylolisthesis (2 cases) of Ⅰ degree; They were treated with posterior interlaminar and interspinous process fusion; Group Ⅱ consisted of 31 cases with degenerative spondylolisthesis (2 cases) and isthmic spondylolisthesis (23 patients) and traumatic spondylolisthesis (6 cases) of Ⅰ degree ( 11 cases) and Ⅱ degree (20 cases) ; They were treated with reduction of sliding vertebra and posterior interlaminar and interspinous process fusion; Group Ⅲ consisted of 19 cases with degenerative spondylolisthesis (2 cases) and isthmic spondylolistbesis (17 cases) of Ⅰ degree (2 cases), Ⅱ degree (13 cases) and Ⅲ degree (4 cases); They were treated with laminectomy and decompression, with reduction of sliding vertebra and transverse process fusion; Group Ⅳ consisted of 14 cases with isthmic spondylolisthesis of Ⅰ degree ( 1 case), Ⅱ degree ( 10 cases) and Ⅲ degree (3 cases) ; They were treated with laminectomy and decompression, with intervertebral body fusion, with reduction of sliding vertebra and transverse process fusion. [ Result] In group Ⅰ , solid fusion were in 15 cases giving a fusion rate of 83% , 0. 03% rate of reduction, 52.69% rate of improvement; In group Ⅱ , solid fusion were in 30 cases giving a fusion rate of 96% , 56. 20% rate of improvement, 83% rate of reduction; In group Ⅲ, fusion rate, reduction rate and improvement rate reached 89%, 90%, 59. 85% respectively; In group Ⅳ, the fusion rate, reduction rate and improvement rate were as high as 100% , 92% , 61.08% respec
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117