保守和手术治疗锁骨骨折的成本-效果分析  

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Closed and Operative Treatment of Clavicle Fracture

作　　者：吴宇峰[1] 伍中庆[1] 苏培基[1] 高大伟[1] 李兆青[1] 邓宾[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州中医药大学中山附属医院,中山528400

出　　处：《中国中医骨伤科杂志》2006年第3期21-23,共3页Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics

摘　　要：目的：对锁骨骨折的保守和手术治疗方案进行经济学评价。方法：根据我院2003-2005年的545例锁骨骨折。临床资料，用成本-效果分析的方法进行比较。结果：保守治疗组的成本效果比为4．47，手术治疗组的成本效果比为16．87。结论：从成本-效果分析的角度，保守治疗是锁骨骨折的较佳方案，但临床并未较多地采纳，其原因值得进一步探讨。Objective：To carry about the economical evaluation of closed and operative treatment of clavicle fracture. Methods ：The data of 545 cases of clavicle fracture from 2003 to 2005 were evaluated using the method of cost--effectiveness analysis. Results：The value of cost--effectiveness analysis of closed treatment group was 4.47, while the value of operative treatment group was 16.87. Conclusions：Closed treatment is the better method according to the results of cost--effectiveness analysis, but more patients choosed operative treatment in fact,whose cause needed to be researched further.

关 键 词：成本-效果分析 锁骨骨折 保守治疗 手术治疗 

分 类 号：R683.41[医药卫生—骨科学]