检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王伟[1]
出 处:《四川理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2006年第3期41-44,共4页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:四川省教育厅社会科学青年基金资助项目(川教科SB04-010)
摘 要:立足于我国宪法解释的现状,无论从最高人民法院以司法方式解释宪法的社会基础和活动空间亦即其面临的现实动力和压力方面,还是解释的运作方式和实际表现亦即其个案和附带性质方面,我们都可以看出,宪法司法解释得以规范和奏效很大程度上有赖于其在我国几个效力不同、功能各异和相对独立的宪法解释所构成的有机联系的宪法解释体制中符合司法的特性及其依附的政治体制架构。Based on the status quo of the Constitution interpretation in China, from the angle of the social base and activity space, i.e. its realistic motive force and pressure that the Supreme People' s Court interprets the Constitution in judicial way, or from the angle of its operational way and actual performance, i.e. its case and attached characters, we can find out, to a great extent, only accorded the judicial interpretation of the Constitution with the judicial characters and the political system framework it attaches can it be normalized and effective in the organic system of the Constitution interpretation which is interpretations in effects and functions. composed of several different independent constitution interpretations in effects and functions.
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.183