尿液标本采集方法对尿镉检测结果的影响  

The Effect of Collecting Urinary Samples on the Test of Cd in Urine

作　　者：贺可俭[1] 张春明[1] 陈彩会[1] 李子勤[1] 

机构地区：[1]惠州市疾病预防控制中心,广东惠州516008

出　　处：《护理学报》2006年第6期9-10,共2页Journal of Nursing（China）

基　　金：2005年惠州市科技计划项目(Y200558)

摘　　要：目的探讨镉作业人员尿液标本采集方法对尿镉含量检测结果的影响,为探讨准确的尿液标本采集方法提供依据。方法对某厂同一组镉作业人员分别在不同环境下、用不同方法采集尿液标本,并进行检测。(1)常规法:采集尿液时被检测人员要脱离工作场所,换下工作服,洗净手等部位后,进行采集。(2)改良法:与常规法不同的是被检测人员要彻底更换服装,全身沐浴后,进行采集。结果常规法采集尿液标本超标率为36.9%,改良法采集尿液标本超标率为15.1%,两种尿液标本采集方法检测结果对比,差别有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于职业性镉从业人员尿镉水平检测,收集尿液标本是最为关键的一个环节,只有正确选择采集方法,严格把好质量关,才能保证检测结果的准确性。Objective To explore if the methods of urinary sample collection affect Cd contents in samples and to work out a foundation for better methods of collecting urinary samples. Methods Urinary samples from the workers contacting Cd in a factory were collected in different surroundings using different methods and then tested.（1）Routine collection method. The workers had to leave the working sites, altered their working clothes and washed their hands and finally went for urinary collections. （2）The improved method： They had to leave the working sites, altered their working clothes thoroughly, took a bath and finally went for urinary collections. Results The collected samples by routine method exceeded the standard of Cd content at a rate of 36.9%, while those by the improved method did at a rate of 15.1%, demonstrating significant difference between the two methods （P〈0.05）. Conclusion To detect the Cd level from the people contacting Cd at work, the key step exists in collection of their urinary samples. Only by correct collection method can the accuracy be ensured in testing.

关 键 词：尿镉检测 尿液标本 采集方法 

分 类 号：R466.129[医药卫生—临床医学] R135.1