检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴学斌[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2006年第9期39-42,共4页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:遗弃罪是传统型的犯罪,随着社会观念与人际关系的变迁,如果将遗弃罪的行为对象仅限定在家庭成员之间,并不利于对公民人身法益的保护。遗弃罪在刑法体系中位置的变化为重新建构遗弃罪的内涵提供了契机。正确理解刑法上的“扶养义务”是合理确定遗弃罪行为对象外延的关键。“紧密生活共同体”是认定遗弃罪中“扶养义务”的现实基础。“扶养义务”的来源受事实上扶养关系的制约。义务的扶养性、义务程度的紧迫性是遗弃罪与以遗弃方式实施的不作为的故意杀人罪的主要区别。The guilty of abandonment is a traditional crime. If the victims of the crime are limited among family members, it is not favor for the protection of person's The new criminal law setup it a different place. The changes of the social notions provide a tuning point to comprehend the crime. The active criminal law do not limit the victims of the guilty of abandonment among the families. It is not the best choice to cognize the families as exclusive victims of the guilty of abandonment. To apprehend the duty to support someone to live independently is the key to confirm logically the extension of the victims of the crime. The sources of fostering duty, are restricted by the virtual fostering relation. The fostering and pressing duty differentiates the guilty of abandonment and the guilty of murder as the manner of abandonment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.91