出 处:《世界核心医学期刊文摘(胃肠病学分册)》2006年第5期47-48,共2页Core Journals in Gastroenterology
摘 要:Abstract Abstract Background: Percutaneous microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation are two commonly used modalities for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma; however, comparisons of them have not been documented adequately. Methods: Of 102 patients with biopsy-proved hepatocellular carcinoma, 49 (98 nodules) were treated percutaneously with microwave ablation and 53 (72 nodules) with radiofrequency ablation. The local tumor control, complications related to treatment, and long-term results of the two modalities were compared retrospectively. Results: The complete ablation rates were 94.9% (93/98) using microwave ablation vs 93.1% (67/72) using radiofrequency ablation (P = 0.75), and no significant differences were found either in the ablation of tumors of 3.0cm or less (P = 1.00) or in those of more than 3.0 cm (P = 1.00) between the two modalities. The local recurrence rates were 11.8% (11/93) using microwave ablation vs 20.9% (14/67) using radiofrequency ablation (P = 0.12), and there were no significant differences between the two modalities either in tumors of 3.0cm or less (P = 0.36) or in those of more than 3.0cm (P = 0.82). The rates of major complications associated with microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation were 8.2% (4/49) vs 5.7% (3/53; P = 0.71). The disease-free survival rates in themicrowave ablation group were 45.9% , 26.9% , 26.9% , and 13.4% at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively, and those in the radiofrequency ablation group were 37.2% , 20.7% , and 15.5% at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively (P = 0.53). The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year cumulative survival rates for patients who underwent microwave ablation were 81.6% , 61.2% , 50.5% , and 36.8% , respectively, and for patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation the rates were 71.7% , 47.2% , 37.6% , and 24.2% , respectively (P = 0.12). Conclusions: Percutaneous microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation are both effective methods in treating hepatocellular carcinomas. The local tumor control, complications related to treatmentBackground: Pereutaneous. microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation are two commonly used modalities for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma; however, comparisons of them have not been documented adequately. Methods: Of 102 patients with biopsy-proved hepatocellular carcinoma, 49 (98 nodules) were treated pereutaneously with microwave ablation and 53 (72 nodules) with radiofrequency ablation. The local tumor control, complications related to treatment, and long-term results of the two modalities were compared retrospectively. Results: The complete ablation rates were 94. 9% (93/98) using microwave ablation vs 93. 1% (67/72) using radiofrequency ablation (P = 0. 75), and no significitnt differences were found either in the ablation of tumors of 3.0cm or less (P = 1.00) or in those of more than 3.0 cm (P = 1.00) between the two modalities. The local recurrence rates were 11.8% (11/93) using microwave ablation vs 20. 9% (14/67) using radiofrequency ablation (P = 0. 12), and there were no significant differences between the two modalities either in tumors of 3.0cm or less (P = 0. 36) or in those of more than 3.0cm (P = 0. 82). The rates of major complications associated with microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation were 8.2% (4/49) vs 5.7% (3/ 53; P = 0. 71).
关 键 词:射频消蚀术 消蚀治疗 肝细胞癌 微波 经皮 回顾性 显著性差异 局部肿瘤 局部复发率 相关并发症
分 类 号:R541.710.5[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R735.7[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...