检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾坚未[1] 王祥慧[1] 徐达[1] 周佩军[1] 施国海[1] 尧凯[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院瑞金医院器官移植中心,上海200025
出 处:《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》2006年第6期675-679,共5页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
摘 要:目的 评价以钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)为主要免疫抑制剂的器官移植受者合并危险因素时,应用新型免疫抑制剂西罗莫司(SRL)转换治疗的临床效果及其安全性。方法 对符合入组标准,应用CNI为主要免疫移植剂的75例器官移植受者,进行以SRL为主要免疫抑制剂的转换治疗,CNI在2周内迅速撤除。SRL转换治疗的目标血药浓度为4~8ng/mL,随访观察其临床效果、并发症和不良反应。结果 SRL转换时距移植后时间平均为(13.2±10.7)月,平均随访时间(9.5±6.8)月。SRL转换后1月和6月的血药浓度分别平均为(6.2±1.7)ng/mL和(4.3±0.9)ng/mL。SRL转换治疗后6月内发生急性排斥3例(4.0%),安全撤除皮质激素4例,2例急性难治性移植肾排斥逆转,肺部感染6例(8.0%);血清肌酐转换时为(187.3±71.7)Ixmol/L,转换后6月下降至(137.6±30.3)μmol/L(P<0.01);SRL转换后肝功能恢复正常15例,改善2例;血糖恢复正常6例,改善1例;4例恶性肿瘤SRL转换后随访6~13月,2例稳定,2例肿瘤复发。SRL主要不良反应表现为高脂血症。结论 应用CNI为主要免疫抑制剂的器官移植受者出现一种或多种危险因素时,新型免疫抑制剂SRL提供了较好的治疗选择。Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of converting calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) in organ transplant recipients with risk factors. Methods Seventy-five eligible organ transplant patients treated with CNI as main immunosuppressant were converted to SRL immunosuppressant protocol with fast CNI withdrawal in 2 weeks. SRL was titrated to target trough levels of 4~8 ng/mL. The clinical outcomes,complications and side effects were observed. Results The conversion was performed ( 13.2 ± 10.7 ) months after transplantation with a follow-up of (9.5 ± 6.8) months. SRL target trough levels were (6.2 ± 1.7 ) ng/mL ( first month) and (4.3 ± 0.9) ng/mL(sixth month). Three patients (4.0%) experienced acute rejection. Two patients with acute refractory rejection were reversed successfully. Six patients(8.0% ) were complicated with pulmonary infection within 6 months after SRL conversion. Serum creatinine dropped from ( 187.3 ± 71.7 ) μmol/L ( at conversion) to ( 137.6 ± 30.3 ) μmol/L (6 months after conversion) ( P 〈 0.01 ). CNI-related hepatotoxicity ( n = 17 ) and hyperglycemia ( n = 7 ) were improved after SRL treatment. Two of 4 patients with malignant tumor (follow-up for 6 to 13 months) were stable and the rest recurred. The main side effects of SRL were hyperlipemia. Conclusion The conversion treatment with SRL may be a better option for organ transplant recipients with CNI and risk factors.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31