我国相对负刑事责任年龄的立法缺陷与重构  

The Flaw in The Relative Negative Legal Responsibility Age Legislation in China and Its Reconstruction

作　　者：陈兴旺[1] 陈娟娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学法学院,江苏苏州215006

出　　处：《北京青年政治学院学报》2006年第2期43-48,共6页Journal of Beijing Youth Politics College

摘　　要：由于立法技术的不成熟以及刑法总则与分则的衔接不够协调与一致,致使刑法条文中关于相对负刑事责任年龄的有关规定存在较大缺陷。应将相对负刑事责任年龄人承担刑事责任的几种“罪”明确规定为“犯罪行为”而非“罪名”,将“投毒”改为“投放危险物质”,加入“决水”,排除“贩卖毒品”。以更大限度地达到“社会防卫”与“保护未成年人”的统一与衡平,实现刑法的双重保护目的。Because legislation technology not mature as well as criminal law general rule with minute then links up the insufficient coordination with to be consistent, causes in the criminal law article about to take the legal responsibility age relatively the related stipulation existence big flaw. Should take the legal responsibility age person to undertake legal responsibility several kinds ＂the crime＂ the explicit stipulation is relatively ＂the criminality＂ but must ＂the charge＂, ＂Throw the poisonous＂ will change ＂the delivery dangerous matter＂, will join ＂turn on the water＂, will remove ＂trades the narcotics＂. By a greater limit achieved ＂the social defense＂ and ＂protects the minor＂ unification and balance, realization criminal law dual protection goal.

关 键 词：刑事责任 犯罪行为 危险物质 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]