仲裁:解决我国期货纠纷的最有效方式  

Arbitration: the Most Effective Means to Chinese Futures Disputes

作　　者：刘惠萍[1] 丰久宽[1] 程乐礼 

机构地区：[1]山东经济学院,山东济南250014 [2]山东泉鑫期货经纪公司,山东济南250012

出　　处：《当代经济管理》2006年第3期87-92,共6页Contemporary Economic Management

摘　　要：稳步发展期货市场、建设具有竞争力的现代金融企业是国家的一项方针政策,但传统的期货纠纷诉讼方式存在许多弊端,阻碍了这一政策的落实。采用仲裁方式解决期货交易纠纷有其独到的优势,符合我国国情且与国际通行的做法接轨,建立和完善我国的期货纠纷仲裁制度是国内期货市场改革和发展的必然要求,仲裁应当成为解决我国期货纠纷的最有效方式。Developing futures market steadily and constructing competitive financial companies is a national policy in China. But traditional ;awsuit mode of futures with many drawbacks obstructs the execution of the policy. Arbitration mode, with its advantages for settling futures transaction disputes, conforms to Chinese conditions and follows international practice. So Chinese arbitration system of futures must be established and perfected to fulfill the demands of reformation and development of national futures market. Therefore, arbitration mode will become the most effective mode to resolve Chinese futures disputes.

关 键 词：期货纠纷 诉讼 司法公正 仲裁 专家断案 金融仲裁中心 回避制度 

分 类 号：F832.5[经济管理—金融学]