物权请求权与时效制度  

Rights of Claim in Rem and Limitation System

作　　者：王喜军[1] 姬翠梅[2] 

机构地区：[1]雁北师范学院政教部 [2]大同医学专科学校思政部,山西大同037008

出　　处：《山西农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2006年第3期253-255,共3页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：物权请求权能否适用诉讼时效,理论界存在较多争议。物权请求权与债权请求权虽有不同,但本质上仍是请求权,理应受诉讼时效的限制。在具体制度安排上,除办理了登记的财产的返还请求权不适用诉讼时效以外,其余的物权请求权都应适用诉讼时效。物权请求权与取得时效的关系实质上是关于是否设立取得时效制度的问题。我国民法中应设立完整的取得时效制度。最后对我国的时效制度提出了立法建议。Can rights of claim in rem apply to limitation of action？ There are many disputes in the theories field. This paper insists that although rights of claim in rein are different from tort claims, but they are claims essentially. So they should limited by limitation of action. On the concrete system, all the rights of claim in rem should apply to limitation of action besides eigentumsheraus-gabeanspruch of property which have had registered. The relation of rights of claim in rem and nsucapion is substantially the question about whether establish complete the system of usucapion. Finally, this paper put forward lawmaking suggestion of our limitation system.

关 键 词：物权请求权 时效制度 诉讼时效 取得时效 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]