检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范敏[1] 陈思[1] 蒋锐明[1] 成宝红[1] 崔榕[1]
机构地区:[1]成都市第七人民医院耳鼻喉科,成都610041
出 处:《现代预防医学》2006年第7期1107-1108,共2页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较全麻下等离子刀腭咽成形术与局麻下等离子刀打孔消融+切割术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)疗效。方法:将55例OSAHS患者随机分为两组,A组25例,B组30例,A组采用气管插管,静脉复合麻醉下行等离子刀腭咽成形术;B组采用局麻下等离子刀打孔消融+切割术。术后随访6~12个月。结果:术后6个月,A、B两组有效率比较无显著性差异,分别为88%和83.3%,P〉0.05,术后12个月A组有效率明显优于B组,分别为84%和56.6%,P〈0.01。结论:全麻下等离子刀腭咽成形术较局麻下单纯等离子刀打孔消融+切割术远期疗效好,是一种安全、微创、值得推广的术式。Objective: To compare the effectiveness of coblation assisted uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) under general anesthesia and radiofrequency tissue volumetric reduction (RFTVR) under local anesthesia in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). Methods: 55 OSAHS patients were randomly devided into A group ( n = 25) and B group ( n = 30). Patients in A group were treated with coblation assisted UPPP (CAUP) under general anesthesia, while those in B group were treated with RFTVR under local anesthesia. All patients were followed up from 6 to 12 months. Results: 6 months after operation, the validity ratios of two groups were of no statistical significance (88.0% and 88.3% ) (P 〉0.05). However, the validity ratios of 12 months after operation were of significant difference between A group and B group, which was 84.0 % and 56.6 % respectively ( P 〈 0.01). Conclusion: The long-term effectiveness of CAUP under general anesthesia was better than that of of RFTVR unde local anesthesia. The CAUP under general anesthsia was a safe, microinvasive and practical method for the patients with OSAHS.
关 键 词:低温等离子手术系统(ENTec-ooblutor^TM) 阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS) 腭咽成形术是一种安全、微创、值得推广的术式
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117