对于自首“其他罪行”司法解释的商榷  

Negative Evaluation on the Judicial Explanation of "Other Crime" of Surrender

作　　者：曹吴清[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《浙江海洋学院学报（人文科学版）》2006年第2期24-27,共4页Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University(Humane Science)

摘　　要：最高人民法院在对自首“其他罪行”的司法解释中排除了同种类罪行,这于理论和实践都是不妥的,在理论上违背了罪刑法定原则和“期待可能性”,实践中既不利于被告自救和自新,也不利于司法工作效率和质量。为此建议通过立法或立法解释予以更正,以解决这个解释带来的不便。The Supreme People＇s Court＇s judicial explanation of ＂other. crime＂ of surrender expel the same kind crime, which is harmful to theory and practice, in theory it violates the principle of legality and ＂expected possibility＂, in practice it is harmful not only to the defendants＇ self-correction, but also to the iudicial efficiency and quality. The writer appeals legislation or legislative explanation to correct it in order to solve the explanation＇s defection.

关 键 词：其他罪行 司法解释 同种类 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]