检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王颖彦[1] 常瑞明[2] 常建星[2] 温立强[2] 江志鹏[2] 吴畏[2]
机构地区:[1]广东省中医院药学部临床药学室,510120 [2]中山大学附属第二医院急诊科
出 处:《岭南急诊医学杂志》2006年第3期208-209,共2页Lingnan Journal of Emergency Medicine
摘 要:目的:研究肌注蒙洛英与度冷丁治疗肾绞痛的止痛疗效比较。方法:300名肾绞痛患者随机分成两组,蒙洛英组(n=150),肌注蒙洛英2ml,度冷丁组(n=150),肌注度冷丁100mg,用药后0h,0.5h,1h,6h分别进行止痛疗效比较。结果:随着时间变化,两种药物对肾绞痛都有效,但疗效无显著差异性。结论:蒙洛英与度冷丁对肾绞痛的止痛疗效相当,但蒙洛英更安全、用药方便。Objective: To compare the efficacy of Paracetamol and Pethidine in treatment of renal colic. Methods: 300 patients were divided into Paracetamol and Pethidine groups randomly, received either 2 ml of Paracetamol or 100 mg Pethidine i.m (intramuscalarly). Evaluations were performed at 0 h,0.5 h,1 h and 6h after treatment. Results: Paracetamol and Pethidine were efficient for renal colic, but there was no significant difference between Paracetamol and Pethidine with the treatment efficacy over time. Conclusion: Paracetamol and Pethidine are equally effective in the treatment of renal colic, but Paracetamol is more convenient and safer than Pethidine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.157