检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第二军医大学长海医院超声科,上海200433
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2006年第6期880-882,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助(编号30370401)。
摘 要:目的探讨经颅彩色双功超声(TCCS)及超声造影(CEUS)对颅内动脉狭窄诊断的价值,并与DSA结果对照评价其可靠性。方法对58例临床疑颅内动脉狭窄的患者一周内行TCCS和DSA检查颅内动脉。结果DSA共检出31条大脑中动脉(MCA)狭窄,TCCS及CEUS检出28条,DSA未证实有狭窄的MCA血管中,TCCS检出1条有狭窄,TCCS诊断MCA狭窄的敏感性、特异性、假阳性和假阴性分别为90.3%、96.5%、3.5%和10.3%。结论TCCS和CEUS诊断颅内动脉狭窄有较好的准确性,是其检查的有效方法。Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value and reliability of transcranial color-duplex sonography (TCCS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) on cerebral arterial stenosis by comparing with DSA. Methods A total of 58 cases suspected of cerebral arterial stenosis underwent both TCCS and DSA examination in the same week. Results Thirty-one cases with the middle cerebral artery (MCA) stenosis were diagnosed by DSA, 28 of 31 MCA stenosis were detected by TCCS and CEUS. However, one MCA stenosis showed on TCCS was negative of stenosis by DSA. Statistics of accuracy of TCCS and CEUS in diagnosing MCA stenosis were sensitivity (90.3%), specificity (96.5%), false positive (3.5%) and false negative (10.3%) respectively. Conclusion TCCS and ECE are valuable in diagnosis of cerebral arterial stenosis.
关 键 词:超声检查 多普勒 经颅 数字减影血管造影 脑动脉 狭窄
分 类 号:R543.4[医药卫生—心血管疾病] R445.1[医药卫生—内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229