两种钻井液出口流量测量方法的对比分析  被引量:5

Comparative analysis between two methods measuring drilling fluid flow out rate

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李臣[1] 王立波[1] 

机构地区:[1]胜利油田地质录井公司

出  处:《录井工程》2006年第2期60-61,共2页Mud Logging Engineering

摘  要:钻井过程中,为了实现对钻井液出口流量的监控,综合录井常使用靶式流量传感器或超声波液位传感器测量钻井液出口流量变化。在简述两种方法测量原理及其特点基础上,结合其各自应用分析及安装与测量过程,对两种方法的影响因素及测量精度进行了对比,实例表明靶式流量传感器测量精度远低于超声波液位传感器。因此,应用超声波液位传感器取代靶式流量传感器进行钻井液出口流量的检测应是一种发展趋势。During drilling, in order to realize drilling fluid flow out rate monitoring, the two different detection methods of the target-type flow sensor and ultrasonic level sensor were often used in comprehensive mud logging to measure drilling fluid out rate. On the basis of briefly introducing the measuring principles and characteristics of these two methods, and combining their application analysis, mounting and measuring process, the paper made a comparison of the influence factors with the measuring accuracy between them. The practice indicated that the accuracy of the target type flow sensor was far lower than that of the ultrasonic level sensor. So, it should be a developing trend to replace the target type flow sensor with the ultrasonic level sensor to measure drilling fluid flow out rate.

关 键 词:钻井液 出口流量 测量 传感器 超声波 对比 

分 类 号:TE254.4[石油与天然气工程—油气井工程] TV211.1[水利工程—水文学及水资源]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象