小高层住宅结构方案——大开洞剪力墙与异型柱框剪结构对比分析  

Comparison between large-opening shear wall and special-shaped column frame-shear wall in high-rise buildings

作　　者：侯书利 汪明栋[2] 徐若娅 康丽[4] 

机构地区：[1]济南同圆建筑设计研究院有限公司,山东济南250001 [2]山东交通学院,山东济南250023 [3]济南市建设工程勘察设计质量监督站,山东济南250001 [4]山东商业职业技术学院,山东济南250001

出　　处：《地震工程与工程振动》2006年第3期148-151,共4页Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics

摘　　要：通过对某小区小高层住宅2种结构方案的综合讨论,分析了小高层住宅的合理结构型式,提出了设计建议可供工程设计参考。异型柱框架-剪力墙结构框架柱布置灵活、隐蔽性好,但其柱截面不规则、计算理论不成熟、抗震能力较差、构造措施不理想、而且建筑自振周期长,侧向位移大,难以用于较高的高层住宅和抗震烈度较高的地区;大开洞剪力墙结构受力明确、计算理论成熟,又有较为精确的计算程序,而且墙厚可以在规范允许的范围内减薄,从而进一步降低了工程造价。通过2种方案比较,认为大开洞剪力墙体系与异型柱框剪结构相比,配筋总量基本接近,但其侧移较小,具有较好的延性,可应用于小高层住宅和地震烈度较高地区并可取得显著经济效益。Based on the comparison of two types of structures for high-rise residential buildings, suggestmns are made for design to offer references for certain projects. For frame-shear wall structure with special-shaped columns, due to its irregular sections, lateral displacement and subsequent poor seismic behavior, the application will be restricted while taking into account building heights and seismic intensity. Large-opening shear wall structures, however, with clear mechanical principles and precise computer programs, calculations can easily be conducted. The seismic property of large-opening shear walls is better than those frames with special-shaped columns. In the areas of higher seismic intensity, in particular, shear wall structures are strongly recommended for high-rise residential buildings.

关 键 词：大开洞剪力墙结构 异型柱框剪结构 设计对比 

分 类 号：P315.97[天文地球—地震学]