检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗志宏[1] 梅志丹[1] 陈始明[1] 陶泽璋[1] 曹永茂[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉大学人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,湖北武汉430060
出 处:《中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科》2006年第6期420-422,共3页Chinese Archives of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
基 金:湖北省科技攻关项目(2004AA301C30);湖北省教育厅资助项目(2003X114)
摘 要:目的对局麻射频消融腭咽成形术与射频消融缩容术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(obstructivesleepapneahypopneasyndrome,OSAHS)的效果进行比较,为OSAHS的治疗提供客观依据。方法选用局麻射频消融腭咽成形术与射频消融缩容术分别对69例和79例OSAHS患者进行治疗,术后随访6个月和12个月,比较两种手术方法的疗效及并发症情况。结果术后6个月有效率分别为85.5%和81.0%,差异无显著性。术后12个月局麻射频消融腭咽成形术疗效优于射频消融缩容术,有效率分别为78.3%和49.3%,差异有显著性。两种手术方法均无严重并发症。结论局麻射频消融腭咽成形术较射频消融缩容术远期效果好,无严重手术并发症。在病例选择合适时用局麻方法可达到全麻手术效果。OBJECTIVE To compare the results of plasma scalpel assisted uvulopalatopharyngoplasty(UP PP) under local anesthesia (PS) with radiofrequency volumetric tissue reduction (RF) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea/hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). METHODS Sixty-nine and 79 patients were treated with PS and RF respectively. They were followed-up for 6 and 12 months after operation and the outcomes of the 2 surgical methods were compared. RESULTS The improvement rates at 6 months after PS and RF were 85.5 % and 83.5 % respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 methods. The improvement rates at 12 months after PS and RF were 78.3 % and 49.3 % respectively. The difference was significant. No major complication was found. CONCLUSION The long-term outcome of PS is better than that of RF. PS surgery may be comparable with surgery under general anesthesia in some special cases.
关 键 词:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征 悬雍垂腭咽成形术 射频消融
分 类 号:R766[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15