气压弹道碎石与体外冲击波碎石的比较  

Comparison of ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi

作　　者：谢磊 虞晓勇 李文杰 叶琪辉 谢超凡[2] 夏宏辉 

机构地区：[1]深圳市南山人民医院泌尿外科,广东省深圳518052 [2]中山大学中山医学院03届

出　　处：《中国基层医药》2006年第6期910-911,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy

摘　　要：目的评价输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术(PL)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效。方法对经PL(PL组)和ESWL(ESWL组)治疗的输尿管下段结石患者的临床资料进行比较。结果术后4周结石排净率PL组为97.19%,ESWL组为73.16%。两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论输尿管镜气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效明显优于ESWL。Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect and safety of ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy （PL） and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy（ESWL） in the treatment of distal ureteral calculi. Methods 368 cases of distal ureteral calculi were divided into the PL treatment group（178 cases） and the ESWL treatment groups （190 cases）. The clinical datas were compared between the two groups. Results PL treatment group 97.19% patients became stone free in 4 weeks,and in ESWL treatment group the stone free rate was 73.16 % （ P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion For the treatment of distal ureteral calculi, ureteroscopy pneumatic lithotripsy has a higher stone free rate than ESWL.

关 键 词：输尿管结石 输尿管镜 碎石术 

分 类 号：R693.4[医药卫生—泌尿科学] R691.4[医药卫生—外科学]