检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王云芳[1] 张晓兰[1] 孙敏[1] 刘风芝[1]
出 处:《中国消毒学杂志》2006年第4期326-327,共2页Chinese Journal of Disinfection
摘 要:为观察常规监测法与紫外线强度检测装置对紫外线灯辐照强度检测中的效果,在临床实际应用中进行了检测比较。结果,常规监测法对监测人员的眼睛和皮肤均有不同程度损伤,紫外线灯管辐照强度的达标率为90.92%。用紫外线强度检测装置法监测,对监测人员不会造成皮肤和眼睛的损伤,紫外线灯管辐照强度的达标率为96.94%。结论,使用紫外线强度检测装置法进行紫外线灯辐照强度监测不会伤害监测人员的眼睛和皮肤,方法规范,准确性高。In order to observe the efficacy of routine monitoring method and ultraviolet photometric detecting device in detecting radiation intensity of ultraviolet lamp, comparison of detection was carried out in clinical application. Results: The routine monitoring method caused injury of eyes and skin of monitors to various degrees and the rate of reaching targeted level of radiation intensity of the ultraviolet lamps was 90.92%. Monitoring with ultraviolet photometric device did not cause injury of skin and eyes of monitors and the rate of reaching targeted level of radiation intensity of the ultraviolet lamps was 96.94%. Conclusion: Use of ultraviolet photometric device to monitor ultraviolet radiation intensity would not injure the eyes and skin of the monitors and the method conforms to the standard with high accuracy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229