检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖唐镖[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学社会稳定与危机管理研究中心,重庆400031
出 处:《文史哲》2006年第4期156-163,共8页Literature,History,and Philosophy
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目<农村宗族与村民自治的互动关系研究>(02BSH010);福特基金会项目<乡村治理中宗族问题的改进>(10450716)的成果
摘 要:在当今中国乡村研究中,宗族“重建论”与“瓦解论”同存;对宗族在乡村治理中的功能的“肯定论”、“负面论”与“中性论”同在,至今尚未形成关于宗族重建及其与乡村治理关系的清晰图像与理解。这种状况与近年来研究方法等方面的缺失密切相关。尽管越来越多的研究者已在深入田野,以抓取第一手资料,且研究的规范性增强,学术对话意识和累积意识大步提升,但多数人所作的只是个案研究,尚未延伸为多个案例的比较研究,更未有较大面积的抽样调查;既缺乏明确的分析框架和讨论标准,也缺乏深入细致的专题研究,资料收集和分析的视角也不够多样化。Looking through all the research works concerning current situations of rural China, we find both a theory of rebuilding and a theory of collapse; as to the functions of the Clan in village governance, we find that the theory can be affirmative, negative and neutral. Numerous and confused theories all come out, and till now, people still do not have a distinct understanding of the rebuilding of clans and the relationship between clan and village governance. This status can be explained by the short of research. Though more and more researchers have been conducted with fieldwork, and the study is becoming more standard and with more academic dialogue and accumulative senses, and most of them made case studies, there is an obvious lacking in comparison among cases, a lacking in sampling surveys in full scale; the researches lack of a definite analyzing frame and a standard for discussion, fall short of a deep and detailed monographic study, and short of varied angles of vision to material collection and analysis.
分 类 号:D422.6[政治法律—政治学] C912.82[政治法律—国际共产主义运动]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145