检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄丽华[1] 张赛君[1] 温燕玲[1] 沈丽华[1] 金静[1] 蔡丽霞[1] 乐罗园[2]
机构地区:[1]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院,杭州市310003 [2]浙江大学医学院统计教研室
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2006年第7期589-593,共5页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:浙江省卫生厅科研基金资助项目(项目编号:2004A024)
摘 要:目的探讨肝移植患者的生活质量及影响因素。方法用生活质量综合评定量表(GQOLI-74)对肝移植组和对照组各55例进行评估比较,对可能影响生活质量的因素进行单因素和多因素分析。结果①肝移植患者在躯体功能、社会功能方面低于正常人群,在物质功能、心理功能、生活质量总分方面与正常人群无显著性差异。②单因素分析显示,生活质量总分与面对、E量分、社会支持总分、主观社会支持呈正相关,与屈服、N量分、SAS、SDS呈负相关;躯体功能与E量分、主观社会支持呈正相关,与SAS、SDS呈负相关;社会功能与面对、E量分、社会支持总分、主观社会支持、移植时间、经济状况呈正相关,与屈服、N量分、SAS、SDS呈负相关。③多因素分析显示,对生活质量总分发生影响的因素依次为SDS、主观社会支持、重返工作岗位;对躯体功能发生影响的因素依次为SDS、疼痛;对社会功能发生影响的因素依次为SDS、疼痛、经济状况。结论肝移植患者的生活质量在躯体功能、社会功能维度较健康人群低,其生活质量受多种因素影响。Objective Discuss the quality life and correlative factors of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Methods Applying general quality life inventory (GQOLI-74) to investigate the experimental group (n=55) and control group (n=55). Experimental group were outpatients undergoing liver transplantation, and control group were healthy people. Correlate and regression analysis were used to study the correlated factors. Results ①The score on physical well-being and social well-belng in experimental group is lower than that of coutrol group. There were no significant difference in material well-being, psychological well being and health-related life quality total score. ②Correlate analysis show that the total score of GQOLI was positively correlated with confrontation, E score, social support and subject social support. It was negatively correlated with acceptance, N score, SAS and SDS. Physical well-being was positively correlated with E score and subject social support, while was negatively correlated with SAS and SOS. Social well-being was positively correlated with confrontation, E score, social support, subject social support, the time after liver transplantation and economic condition. It was negatively correlated with acceptance, N score, SAS and SOS. ③Regression analysis showed that the relative factors of quality of life were the total score of SOS, subject social support and return to work. The relative factors of physical well-being were SDS, pain. The relative factors of Social well-being were SOS, pain, economic condition. Conclusions The quality of life of patients undergoing liver transplantation was lower than healthy people, Many factors can correlate the patients quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200