变更罪名实证研究  

An Empirical Study on the Change of Accusation

作　　者：白建军[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学法学院

出　　处：《法学研究》2006年第4期51-62,共12页Chinese Journal of Law

基　　金：国家社科基金"刑事司法公正性实证研究"的阶段性成果之一

摘　　要：以最高法院示范性案例中的全部变更罪名案例为样本进行实证研究,可以发现其中存在几对实然关系。变更罪名未必都有失公正也不必然体现实体公正,择轻变更未必都有利于被告,合法的变更未必是合理的变更,变更罪名给法律适用带来的不确定性根植于现行法律和法理之中。对其进行法律解释学和犯罪定义学分析,将有助于对变更罪名现象的解读和限制。By an empirical study on all instructional criminal cases selected by China＇s Supreme Court, in which courts put a different imputation on the alleged offense of the defendant from what the defendant was accused of, we could find several correlations between variants. The article thus concluded that a change of accusation is neither necessarily leading to injustice, nor substantial justice. A change of accusation towards a minor imputation is not definitely favorable to the defendant. Although it is legal, it will not necessarily lead to rationality. A change of accusation leads to uncertainty of application of law, which is rooted in China＇s legal practice and theory. So a study from the viewpoints of legal hermeneutics and the theory about defining crimes will help to make a better understanding of this phenomena of court＇ s rendering different imputations on alleged offenses, and consequently to make the right limitation on it.

关 键 词：变更罪名 法律解释 犯罪定义学 司法质量 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]