新农村建设的经济理路  

The Economic Thought and Approach of New Countryside Reconstruction

作　　者：罗兴佐[1] 申端锋[2] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学,重庆400031 [2]华中科技大学,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《天津行政学院学报》2006年第3期51-54,共4页Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute

基　　金：本文为教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目"我国农村与农民问题研究"(项目编号:03JZD0031)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：学界关于新农村建设的讨论主要有三种主张。一是林毅夫所倡导的“新村运动”,主要是加大农村基础设施建设,增加农民收入,提高农民消费水平,这是当前关于新农村建设的主流思路。其背后体现的是形式主义的主流经济学的学术理路。二是温铁军的主张,主要是发展农村经济合作组织,开展农民文化娱乐活动等,其背后是一种与主流的形式主义经济学相对应的实体主义经济学。第三种较为有代表性的主张是贺雪峰提出的,这一主张认为文化建设重于经济建设,新农村建设实质上是要重塑农村生活的价值合理性和主体性,重建农民的生活方式,其背后乃是一种经济人类学或曰社会学的学术理路。There are three kinds of opinion about the discussion of the new countryside reconstruction in the academic circle. The first is ＂the new village campaign＂ sparkplug by Lin Yifu, which is the mainstream thought of new countryside reconstruction at present. Such claim incarnates the mainstream academic principle of formalist economics. The second is the claim proposed by Wen Tiejun, who advocates developing economic cooperative organization in the rural area, and carrying out cultural entertainment activity for the farmers, and so on. It reflects one kind of substantial economics principle corresponding with the mainstream formalist economics. The third claim is represented by He Xuefeng who proposes that cultural reconstruction is more important than economic development, and the essence of new countryside reconstruction is to reinvent the value rationality and the principal part of village life, rebuild farmer＇s life style. Its logic behind is one kind of academic principle in economic anthropology or sociology.

关 键 词：新农村建设 经济建设 文化建设 

分 类 号：F30[经济管理—产业经济]