检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代预防医学》2006年第8期1322-1324,共3页Modern Preventive Medicine
基 金:江西省高校人文社科研究资助项目(03SH09)
摘 要:目的:探讨同伴教育对在校大学生艾滋病认干预效果,为制定高校预防艾滋病策略提供依据。方法:采用随机整群抽样方法,将抽取的学生以班为单位随机分成两个缦,即干预组(实施同伴教育组)和对照组。对艾滋病防治相关知识认知和行为经同伴教育前后进行调查。结果:教育前大部分都知道艾滋病的主要传播途径,受教育后与教育前及对照组比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但教育前与对照组对一般的生活接触能否传播艾滋病认识比较模糊,经同伴教育后各项均有大幅度提高,与教育前及对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.0002~〈0.0001)。同伴教育后,学生艾滋病基本知识明显增加,与项目开展前及对照组比较均有明显差异(P〈0.0001);学生对艾滋病的态度在教育后明显改善,“愿意与艾滋病患者正常交往”者明显增加,与教育前及对照组各项比较差异明显(P〈0.0001)。结论:同伴教育是提高在校大学生艾滋病认知水平的有效措施。Objective: To investigate the effect of AIDS peer education among college students, and to provide basis for implementation of AIDS prevention and health education. Methods: A cluster sampling method was adopted to draw college students as intervention group and control group. A written survey was carried out. The survey included understandings and knowledge of AIDS, as well as attitude and behavior towards AIDS topics. Results. Before the peer education, most of students knew well about the main transmission routes of AIDS without significant difference in comparison with those after education (all P 〉0.05). However, they knew little about the question such as "whether daily contact is the AIDS transmission route". After education, the rate of correct response to such question and other basic AIDS knowledge is significantly increased (P = 0.0002-〈 0.0001, P 〈 0.0001, respectively). The attitudes towards AIDS patient such as "will make daily contact with them" in intervention group before education and control group were statistical significantly different (P〈0.0001). Conclusion: The peer education about AIDS is effective for college students.
关 键 词:获得性免疫缺陷综合症 同伴教育 认知 效果评价
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249