检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李继华[1]
出 处:《中国康复理论与实践》2006年第6期519-520,共2页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
摘 要:目的比较低频调制的中频电水浴疗法与电磁疗法治疗足跟痛的疗效。方法168例足跟痛患者随机分为低频调制的中频电水浴疗法组和电磁疗法组各84例,比较两组的治疗效果。结果低频调制的中频电水浴疗法组痊愈率71.43%,有效率97.62%;电磁疗法组痊愈率54.76%,有效率84.52%,低频调制的中频电水浴疗法组患者的痊愈平均治疗次数明显少于电磁疗法组(P<0.01)。结论低频调制的中频电水浴疗法在应用上有创新性,是治疗足跟痛的好方法。Objective To compare the effects of modulated medium frequency low frequency current hydroelectric bath therapy and electromagnetic therapy on heel pain. Methods 168 heel pain patients were randomly divided into group A (treated with modulated medium frequency low frequency current hydroelectric bath therapy) and group B (treated with electromagnetic therapy) with 84 cases in each group. The effect of two groups were observed and compared. Results The cure rate and effective rate of the group A were 71. 43% and 97. 62% respectively, those of the group B were 54. 76% and 84. 52% respectively, and the number of average cure times of the group A was significantly less than that of the group B ( P〈0. 01). Conclusion The modulated medium frequency low frequency current hydroelectric bath therapy brings new ideas on clinical application and is a good method for treatment of heel pain.
关 键 词:低频调制的中频电水浴疗法 电磁疗法 足跟痛
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.161.117