复方依那普利/氢氯噻嗪片治疗原发性高血压Ⅱ期临床研究  被引量:4

Efficacy and safety of enalapril/HCTZ compounds versus Enalapril alone in Chinese subjects with primary hypertension

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:华潞[1] 李一石[1] 明广华[1] 柯元南[2] 郭冀珍[3] 范维琥[4] 吴宗贵[5] 黄洁[1] 汪芳[1] 康连鸣[1] 李卫[1] 龚培[1] 

机构地区:[1]中国医学科学院中国协和医科大学心血管病研究所阜外心血管病医院临床药理中心卫生部心血管药物临床研究重点实验室,北京100037 [2]中日友好医院,北京100029 [3]上海交通大学附属瑞金医院,上海200025 [4]复旦大学附属华山医院,上海200040 [5]上海长征医院,上海200003

出  处:《中国新药杂志》2006年第14期1195-1198,共4页Chinese Journal of New Drugs

基  金:国家863攻关项目<临床试验关键技术及平台研究>(2002AA223411;2004AA2Z3760)

摘  要:目的:与依那普利单药比较,评价2种规格的复方依那普利/氢氯噻嗪片治疗原发性高血压病的疗效和安全性。方法:409例原发性高血压患者(坐位舒张压SeDBP 95~115mmHg),经2周洗脱期后随机分入A,B,C三组,分别每日1次口服复方依那普利(E)10mg/氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)6.25mg,E10mg/HCTZ12.5mg或E10mg,治疗4周末诊室血压SeDBP≥90mmHg者剂量加倍,SeDBP<90mmHg者按原剂量治疗,继续治疗4周,共治疗8周。以SeDBP评价治疗8周的疗效,同时评价药物的安全性。结果:治疗8周后,三组血压均有明显下降(P<0.001)。A组(n=110)SeDBP下降(14.05±6.55)mmHg,总有效率81.82%;B组(n=106)分别为(14.01±6.66)mmHg, 83.02%;C组(n=96)分别为(10.82±6.33)mmHg,69.79%。A,B两组8周总有效率组间比较无统计学差异,但均优于C组(P<0.05)。三组总不良反应发生率分别为19.26%,21.90%和21.90%,组间比较无统计学差异。结论:复方依那普利/氢氯噻嗪治疗中国原发性高血压患者的降压疗效明显优于单药依邪普利,耐受性良好。氢氯噻嗪6.25mg与依那普利组成复方制剂时剂量组合尤佳。Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of enalapril/HCTZ (E/HCTZ) compound versus enalapril (E) alone in Chinese subjects with primary hypertension. Methods: Following after a 2-week washing-out period, 409 subjects with seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) of 95 115 mmHg were randomized orally to receive either E/HCTZ 10 mg/6.25 mg( n = 110) , 10 mg/12. 5 mg (n = 106) or E10mg alone (n =96) once daily for 4 weeks. The subjects with SeDBP≥90 mmHg were doubled the dosing of the study drug regimen at the end of 4-week treatment for additional 4 weeks, and the subjects with SeDBP 〈 90 mmHg remained the dosing the study drug regimen for additional 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was to measure the improvement of SeDBP at the end of 8-week treatment. Other endpoints included the assessment of efficacy and safety in the week 2, 4, 6 and 8 post the treatment. Results:All subjects experienced significant improvement of SeDBP at the end of the 8-week treatment (P 〈 0. 01 ), showing the SeDBP reduction by ( 14.05±6.55 ) mmHg ( the response rate of 81.82 % )in E/HCTZ (10mg/6.25 mg) group, (14.01±6.66)mmHg (the response rate of 83.02 %) in E/ HCTZ (10 mg/12.5 mg) group, and (10.82± 6.33)mmHg (the response rate of 69.79 % ) in E alone group, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two bi-regimen groups. A statistical difference was found between the bi-regimen and the mono-regimen groups (P 〈 0.05 ). The incidence rate of adverse events was 19.26% , 21.90% and 21.90% , respectively; the p value showed no significant difference. Conclusion: The efficacy of the E/HCTZ compound is superior to the E alone in the treatment of primary hypertension.

关 键 词:复方依那普利/氢氯噻嗪 依那普利 原发性高血压 

分 类 号:R972.4[医药卫生—药品] R969.4[医药卫生—药学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象