检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:叶永强[1] 王戈[2] 王成交 张帆[2] 张红军[2]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学西南医院肝胆外科医院,重庆402100 [2]山东省单县中心医院 [3]山东省郓城县人民医院
出 处:《腹腔镜外科杂志》2006年第4期292-294,共3页Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜胆道手术后不放置T管(胆道)引流的可行性。方法:对2005年2月至2005年11月我院治疗的行腹腔镜胆总管探查的25例患者进行了前瞻性非随机对照研究。分为两组,观察组未放置T管,共15例;对照组放置T管,共10例。结果:患者均恢复良好。随访1~5月,观察组未发现结石复发或其它并发症,对照组1例残余结石,1例胆道下端狭窄,均经保守治疗后痊愈出院。两组结石残留率、近期并发症发生率、住院费用等方面差异无显著性(P〉0.05),而在手术时间、住院时间等方面差异有显著性(P〈0.05)。结论:腹腔镜胆道探查是较成熟的治疗胆总管结石的方法,根据术前影像学检查及术中胆道镜检查结果,决定是否放置T管引流。Objective: To explore the feasibility of T tube free laparocopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods: 25 cases with common bile duct stones received LCBDE between February, 2005 and November, 2005. All patients were divided into T tube group and T tube free group according to results of ultrasound, ERCP, CT or MRCP. Results: LCBDE was performed successfully in all patients. The follow up ranged from 1 to 5 months. There was no complications such as recurrenc stone and bile leakage in T tube free group. Two complications were found in T tube group, one was residual stone and the other was bile duct stricture. There was no significant difference in complication rate and hospital cost in two groups (P 〉 0.05). But there was significant difference in time of operation and hospitalization (P 〈 0.05). Conclusions: LCBDE was matured technique in treatment of common bile duct stone. Placing T tube or not in LCBDE can be decided on the results of preoperative images and introperative findings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117