检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安理工大学水电学院
出 处:《水文》1996年第6期14-23,共10页Journal of China Hydrology
基 金:陕西省自然科学基金
摘 要:目前广泛应用的几个主要产流模型(蓄满产流模型、考虑入渗率流域分配的超渗产流模型和综合产流模型)各有特点,但以往对它们的综合比较及其相互关系研究得不多,从而造成了用户选择模型的困难。通过深入剖析与对比,搞清了这几个模型之间的联系与区别,以及应用中需要注意的问题。一般情况下。Each of the main runoff yield models (the natural storage model, the model of combining the infiltration curve with the areal distribution curve of the infiltration capacity within the basin, and the compound model), widely applied in China now, has its own distinguishing features. But there are few papers about the comprehensive comparison of them and the relations among them. This causes the difficulties for users to choose the proper model. Therefore, the relations and differences of these models are thoroughly analyzed and compared, and the problems to be noticed in practice are also pointed out. Generally speaking, the compound model of runoff yield should be selected and applied first.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222