检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:喻雷寿[1] 杨冠玲[1] 何振江[1] 李仪芳[1]
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学物理与电信工程学院,广东广州510006
出 处:《光电工程》2006年第8期64-69,共6页Opto-Electronic Engineering
基 金:广东省科技计划项目(2003C103019)
摘 要:恰当地调整动态光散射颗粒测量反演算法的反演范围,使之趋近真实颗粒分布范围是改善反演结果的主要途径之一。目前通用的CONTIN算法尚没有自动调整反演范围的能力,反演质量还有待提高。因此,提出了一种自动调整反演范围的迭代CONTIN算法,并通过动态光散射数值模拟分析,比较了在无噪声和多种噪声水平影响下CONTIN算法和迭代CONTIN算法对单分散和双分散颗粒系的反演结果。研究表明,迭代CONTIN算法与CONTIN算法相比,在反演分布峰值位置、峰宽度、峰对称性、双峰识别能力以及抗噪声干扰等方面都具有明显优势。In particle sizing by dynamic light scattering method, to adjust properly the inverse range of inverse algorithms towards real range of particle distribution is one of the main approaches to improve inverse results. The CONTIN algorithm is one of the algorithms widely used in this field. Since the CONTIN algorithm has no capability to adjust the inverse range automatically, the accuracy of results from CONTIN is not satisfied. Based on CONTIN, an iterative CONTIN algorithm was developed, which can adjust its inverse range automatically. Numerical tests are performed using dynamic light scattering simulation, which simulates mono-disperse particulate systems and dual-disperse particulate systems with zero and nonzero noise pollutions. Comparisons were made between inverse results of CONTIN and those of Iterative CONTIN. The investigation shows that the Iterative CONTIN is better than CONTIN in peak position, peak width and symmetry of inverse distribution, the capability of recognizing double peaks and tolerance of noises.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7