三种木材阻燃剂的对比研究  

Comparative Study of Three Wood Fire-retardants

作　　者：余丽萍[1] 李光沛[1] 崔军辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京林业大学材料科学与技术学院,北京100083

出　　处：《林业机械与木工设备》2006年第9期24-27,共4页Forestry Machinery & Woodworking Equipment

摘　　要：通过处理三组不同密度的水曲柳,对比研究了BL-环保阻燃剂和市场上两种木材阻燃剂的渗透性及阻燃性等。结果表明,BL-环保阻燃剂在阻燃性、抑烟性方面优于另外两种阻燃剂;在渗透性和吸湿性方面居中;而在对木材力学性能的影响方面不如其他两种阻燃剂。By treating manchurian ash of three different densities, the properties of BL-environmentally friendly flame retardant and two wood fire-retardants on the market such as penetrability and flame retardancy was contrasted. The result showed that BL-environmentally friendly flame retardant are excel the others in the flame retardancy and smoke suppressing and its penetrability and humidification are mediate. But its effect on wood mechanical property is not as good as the other flame retardants.

关 键 词：注入深度 燃烧质量损失率 烟密度等级 吸湿增重率 抗弯强度 

分 类 号：TS61[轻工技术与工程]