检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚燕丹[1] 林少芒[1] 卢振和[2] 张智辉[1] 陈金生[2] 胡以则[1]
机构地区:[1]广州医学院第二附属医院普通外科,广东广州510260 [2]广州医学院第二附属医院麻醉科,广东广州510260
出 处:《中国临床医学》2006年第4期525-526,529,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Medicine
基 金:本课题受广东省医学科学基金资助(A2003318)
摘 要:目的:探讨用“退针法”与“进针法”行腰交感神经节射频消融术治疗下肢缺血性疾病的疗效和安全性。方法:40例下肢缺血性疾病患者随机分成两组,分别应用“退针法”与“进针法”行腰交感神经节射频消融术治疗,比较两组的治疗效果和并发症。结果:两组射频术后患肢SpO2脉搏波幅,疼痛VAS评分和溃疡面积均较术前有明显改善(P<0.05);术后患肢足背皮肤温度比术前升高,但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。“退针法”术后并发症较“进针法”少(P<0.05)。结论:两种不同进针法行腰交感神经节射频消融术治疗下肢缺血性疾病的疗效均佳,而“退针法”更为安全。Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of "backward needle" and "forward needle" for radio frequency ablation of lumbar sympathetic ganglion in the treatment of patients with lower limb ischemia. Methods:Forty patients suffering from lower limb ischemia were randomly divided into two groups. One group was given lumbar sympathetic ganglion with the method of "backward needle" ,another group was performed with the method of "forward needle". The efficacy and safety of the two groups were compared. Results: After operation, the efficacy of SPO2 wave amplitude of pedis, visual analogue scale (VAS) and ulcer area in two groups were significantly improved (P〈0. 05). The skin temperation was no significant differ ence between the two groups after operation (P〉0. 05). The complication of "backward needle" group was significantly higher than that of "forward needle" group(P〈0.05). Conclusion:Two methods of puncture for radio frequency ablation of lumbar sympathetic ganglion in the treatment of patients with lower limb ischemia were excellent, The method of "backward needle" had higher safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28