在必然与巧合之间——马伯里诉麦迪逊案解读  

Between Necessity and Coincidence——Interpretation of Marbury v.Madison

作　　者：胡锦光[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2006年第4期128-141,共14页The Jurist

摘　　要：美国宪法虽然没有明确规定司法机关具有违宪审查权,但司法机关拥有违宪审查权具有坚实的政治基础、文化基础和法律基础。马歇尔通过"马伯里诉麦迪逊案"这一千载难逢的绝妙的案件,开创了司法机关拥有违宪审查权的先例。Although that the judicial branch has the constitutional review power is not explicitly stipulated in The American constitution, that the judicial branch has the constitutional review power is based on the solid political basis, the cultural basis and the legal basis. Marshall founded the precedent that the judicial branch has the constitutional review power through ＂Marbury v. Madison＂ that is an excellent case once in a thousand years.

关 键 词：违宪审查 司法审查 宪法解释权 司法机关 

分 类 号：D971.2[政治法律—法学]