检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹绍锐[1]
机构地区:[1]国家检察官学院河南分院科研信息中心,郑州450004
出 处:《广西政法管理干部学院学报》2006年第5期47-51,共5页Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
摘 要:我国刑法53条规定的罚金刑的随时追缴制和罚金减免制度不符合刑罚理性要求,对罚金刑的执行所起的作用也有违立法的初衷,是不科学的也是不合理的。罚金的易科执行经实践是行之有效的方法。本文拟通过对我国罚金执行立法进行检讨,分析罚金易科制度的可行性,找出其合理依据,并提出了完善这一制度的建议。The system of taking over fine at any time and the system of mitigating or annuling fine that criminal law of china in fifty.third clause has stipulated do not suit to reasonal requirment of penalty . They act on the execution of fine penalty disobey the primary purpose to make the law , so they are not scientific and reasonable . Changing fine penalty into other penalty is a effective way in practice . This essay is about to analyze changing fine penalty into other penalty is feasible and to find the reason by making a legislative self-criticsim ,moreover,it propose the advice of the perfecting of it.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38