乳腺疾病的全数字化乳腺摄影与磁共振检查对比研究  被引量:1

Comparative Study of Full-field Digitail Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Disease

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:钱海珊[1] 丁小龙[1] 张海霞[1] 胡幸[1] 孙琦[1] 

机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属第三人民医院放射科,201900

出  处:《中国医学计算机成像杂志》2006年第4期248-251,共4页Chinese Computed Medical Imaging

摘  要:目的:全数字化乳腺摄影与磁共振检查对乳腺疾病的诊断价值。材料和方法:本研究收集了自2003年12月至2006年1月期间行全数字化乳腺摄影并同时行磁共振检查患者共67例,全部经病理证实,其中良性病变38例,恶性病变29例。采用美国GE Senographe2000D全数字化乳腺摄影机及美国GE1.5Tesla MRI扫描仪;采用专门乳腺线圈。全部病例行动态增强扫描和图像后处理。结果:本组显示FFDM对乳腺疾病诊断的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为74.29%,92.1%,83.36%;MRI对乳腺疾病诊断的敏感性、特异性及准确性分别为94.29%,89.47%,91.78%。结论:对于乳腺癌诊断FFDM的特异性高于MRI,而敏感性较低。Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic efficacy of full - field digital mammography (FFDM) with magnetic resonance imaging in breast disease. Materials and Methods:From Dec. 2003 to Jan. 2006 altogether 67 patients taking both the FFDM and MRI entered this study. According to biopsy, 38 of them were diagnosed with benign lesions and 29 with malignant lesions. They were examined all by FFDM system (GE Senographe 2000D) pins (GE 1.5T) MR technology. Specific breast array coil were chosen.All of case are enhanced and obtained date analysis. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FFDM were 74.29%, 92. l%and83.36% while the percents of MRI were 94.29%, 89.47% and91.78%. Conclusion: FFDM is specificitive and less sensitive than MRI in diagnosis of breast cancer.

关 键 词:乳腺疾病 全数字化乳腺摄影 磁共振成像 

分 类 号:R445[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象