复方七叶皂苷钠凝胶治疗肋软骨炎的临床疗效  

Clinical Effects of Compound Sodium Aescinate Gel in the Treatment of Tietze′s Syndrome

作　　者：曹润武[1] 曹东平[1] 安贺军[1] 郝佳[1] 李洁[1] 杨戈[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军第306医院门诊部综合外科,北京市100101

出　　处：《中国全科医学》2006年第18期1542-1543,共2页Chinese General Practice

摘　　要：目的观察七叶皂苷钠凝胶治疗肋软骨炎的疗效。方法将80例肋软骨炎患者随机分为治疗组(40例)和对照组(40例)。治疗组采用复方七叶皂苷钠凝胶3g外搽患处,4次/d,20min/次;对照组采用双氯芬酸乳胶剂3g外搽患处,4次/d,20min/次,观察两组患者的疗效和不良反应。结果两种方法的止痛效果间差别无显著性意义(P>0·05),但七叶皂苷钠凝胶可明显消除肋软骨肿胀(P<0·05);两组患者均无不良反应。结论复方七叶皂苷钠凝胶治疗肋软骨炎的止痛效果与双氯芬酸乳胶剂基本相同,但能较好消除肋软骨肿胀。Objective To observe the curative effects of compound sodium aescinate gel in the treatment of Tietze＇s syndrome. Methods 80 patients with Tietze＇s syndrome were randomly divided into two groups： treatment group （40 cases） and control group （40 cases）. Patients in the treatment group were treated with compound sodium aescinate gel, and patients in the control group were treated with diclofenac diethylamine em＇ulgel, each of the patients was softly permeated with 3 g either of the two kind of drugs, four times one day, and 20 min once. Results There was no significant difference between two groups in pain relief （ P 〉0. 05）; however, in the swelling relief, compound sodium aescinate gel was superior to diclofenac diethylamine emulgel （ P 〈 0. 05 ）, there were no side effects in both groups. Conclusion There are no significant differences in the pain relief of Tietze＇s syndrome between compound sodium aescinate gel and diclofenac diethylamine emulgel; but compound sodium aescinate gel is superior to diclofenac diethylamine emulgel to relieve the swelling of Tietze＇s syndrome.

关 键 词：复方七叶皂苷钠凝胶 TIETZE综合征 疼痛 肿胀 

分 类 号：R971.1[医药卫生—药品] R681.32[医药卫生—药学]