检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黎四奇[1]
出 处:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2006年第4期404-412,共9页Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金(04CFX008)
摘 要:"一事一法""先粗后细"及"应急式"的规则供给模式造成了我国金融法则体系的混乱状态,从而导致中国的金融法则供给机制违背了规则供给原理中的基本哲学,产生了上位法不若下位法、后法不若前法及同位法相互排斥等奇怪现象。金融法治化是我们追求的目标,但是金融法则供给的混乱正在侵蚀我们的理想家园。因此,正视这种现象,注重我国社会的客观情况,注重金融立法的国际化趋势,是我国金融立法走向坦途的关键。The present mode of legal provision has so greatly caused the disorder of the system of Chinese financial law that the mode is against the fundamental philosophy of rule-making, and that there exist the following phenomena that the upper rules are inferior to lower rules, and conflicts between rules, etc. The rule of financial law is our dream. However, this disorder is eroding this dream. Therefore, it is the crux to face the fact and provide remedies on the basis of native resources and nationality of social relationships.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145