检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院心内科,黑龙江省哈尔滨市150001
出 处:《中国循环杂志》2006年第4期282-283,共2页Chinese Circulation Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者消融慢径对房室结电生理特性的影响。方法:①比较34例患者射频消融术前及术后AH间期、房室结前传及逆传文氏周期、快径路及慢径路前传有效不应期。②根据术后慢径是否消失将34例患者分为:慢径消失组(n=24);慢径改良组(n=10),比较两组间快径及慢径前传有效不应期。结果:房室结改良前后文氏周期变化:34例患者在未分组前射频消融前后房室结文氏周期无明显变化。快径前传有效不应期:慢径消失组快径前传有效不应期术后较术前降低,有显著性差异(P<0.05);慢径改良组慢径前传有效不应期术后较术前延长,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:快径前传有效不应期的缩短与消融后慢径是否残存有关;慢径的消融影响房室结的前向传导。Objective: To investigate the electrophysiological changes of the atrialventricular node(AVN) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) by slow pathway in patients with AVN reentrant tachycardia(AVNRT). Methods: ①The AH interval, AVN antegrade and retrograde Wenckbach' s block points(ms) of 34 patients before and after RFCA were compared. ②The patients with AVNRT were divided into two groups according to weather slow pathway was eliminated. In group A (n =24) : slow pathway was completely eliminated. In group B (n = 10) :slow pathway was modified. The fast pathway and slow pathway antegrade effective refractory period (ERP) were compared between the two groups. Results:There was no difference in AH interval,AVN antegrade and retrograde Wenckbach' s block points(ms) in the patients before and after RFCA ( P 〉 0. 05 ). The fast pathway antegrade ERP was shortened in Group A ( P 〈 0. 05 ) but not changed in Group B ( P 〉 0.05 ) after RFCA. The slow pathway antegrade ERP was extended in Group B ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion:The shortened fast pathway antegrade ERP was associated with the residual slow pathway. The ablation by slow pathway only enfluences AVN antegrade conduction.
关 键 词:房室结折返性心动过速 射频消融 电生理
分 类 号:R541[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49