检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张帆[1] 刘芳[2] 邓俐[1] 于磊[1] 郑俊炜[1] 张堂德[1] 黄亦加[1] 莫银娟[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学珠江医院皮肤科,广州510282 [2]南方医科大学珠江医院门诊部,广州510282
出 处:《微生物学免疫学进展》2006年第3期27-28,共2页Progress In Microbiology and Immunology
摘 要:比较分析生殖器疱疹病毒抗原的两种检测方法,找出更为准确、简便、经济、实用的检测方法,分别利用疱疹病毒抗原酶免疫(ELISA)法和荧光定量PCR(FQ-PCR)法检测南方医科大学珠江医院门诊患者538例。酶免疫法检出率为27.5%,略低于荧光定量PCR法的28.3%,经SPSS12.0分析,两种方法检测结果无显著差异。酶免疫法检测生殖器疱疹病毒抗原具有操作简便、快捷、经济等特点,而敏感性和特异性均无显著差别,是一种更适合临床的检验方法,更具有值得推广使用的价值。Search for a diagnostic method was conducted, with a higher sensitivity and reliability including economical and practical advantages in detection of genital herpes virus ( HSV-2 ). ELISA and FQ-PCR were used to detect 538 clinical specimens in our hospital, in comparison with the two detection methods. The results showed 148 of them were ELISA positive and 152 of them were FQ-PCR positive, on which had no significant difference in between two methods by using software SPSS 12.0. It suggest that ELISA is suitable to be used as a common laboratory diagnostic method for HSV-2.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222