检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周新年[1] 张正雄[1] 陈玉凤[1] 李纲[1] 邓盛梅[2]
机构地区:[1]福建农林大学,福州350002 [2]福建省林业科学研究院,福州350012
出 处:《林业科学》2006年第8期69-73,共5页Scientia Silvae Sinicae
基 金:福建省自然科学基金资助项目(E99001);福建省林业厅科学基金资助项目(闽林科[2000]08号文第3(6)项)。
摘 要:对南方人工林伐区的常用4种木材运输作业模式进行综合效益分析与评价。结果表明:在相同的作业条件下,不同木材运输作业模式,其经济效益、生态效益和社会效益以及综合效益均不同。建议林业生产决策部门在选择人工林伐区运材作业模式时应综合考虑其经济、生态和社会效益,在有水路运输条件的伐区,应优先选择船运木材或排运木材;在无水路运输条件的伐区,则应优先选择农用车运材。Through analysis and evaluation on four kinds of wood transportation models commonly used in our country's southern artificial forest area, the result shows that under the same operation conditions, the economic benefits, ecologic benefits, social benefits and comprehensive benefits of different operation models of different wood transportation are different. It is proposed that the production decision department of the forestry should consider the economic, ecologic and social benefit synthetically in choosing the model of wood transportation for artificial forest cutting area. Wood transportation by boat or by rafting should have priority to be selected in the cutting area with the condition of waterway transportation. Wood transportation by farm truck should have priority to be selected in the cutting area without the condition of waterway transportation.
分 类 号:S782.5[农业科学—木材科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13