检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王振生[1]
机构地区:[1]安阳师范学院,河南安阳455002
出 处:《郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年第5期105-108,共4页Journal of Zhengzhou University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基 金:河南省社会科学基金项目"经济全球化条件下我国刑事控制模式问题研究"(2002EFX007)
摘 要:刑罚正当性根据是整个刑罚理论的基础,直到目前最有影响的有三种学说:报应正当论、预防正当论和报应与预防一体论。本文在评析传统理论的基础上,提出了创新的观点:科学的刑罚正当性根据应坚持以间接一般预防为中心,兼顾报应与特殊预防的要求,即在间接一般预防基础上的报应与特殊预防的有机统一。这一观点可以为我国刑事政策的调整提供理论依据。The punishment legitimate foundation is the basis of the whole punishment theory. Till now, for this, there are three most effective theories: 1. retribution being just theory; 2. prevention being just theory; 3 combining the above two into integration theory. In this note, the author puts forth an innovation viewpoint: For the scientific punishment legitimate nature, it is necessary to adhere to taking general indirect prevention as the center; concurrently to consider the need of retribution and special prevention; i.e. on the basis of indirect general prevention, organically unite retribution with special prevention. This viewpoint may provide the theoretic foundation for our country's criminal policy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7