检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵轶峰[1]
机构地区:[1]东北师范大学亚洲文明研究院,吉林长春130024
出 处:《东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006年第5期80-84,共5页Journal of Northeast Normal University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地招标项目(2001ZDXM770008)
摘 要:结合皮特.斯特恩斯等所著《全球文明史》中体现出来的世界史方法论和体系思想,笔者认为,“世界史”与中国史不应是对应关系,中国以外国家、地区史不是世界史,只有从总体把握世界历史宏观进程的研究才是世界史研究。在此基础上,提出了关于历史学内部学科分支类目重新斟酌的建议,并结合《全球文明史》就具有整体观念的世界史的编纂学问题提出了一些看法。In connection to the methodology and historiography in Peter Stems' World Civilizations: The Global Experiences, this article argues that "world history" is not a corresponding field of "Chinese history". The history of countries other than China and other regions should not be regarded as "world history". World history is a special area concerning the general and worldwide process of historical experiences. Based upon these points, this article suggests a reconsideration of the sub - area distinction within the discipline of history. In addition, in commenting on the historiography characteristics of World Civilizations: The Global Experiences, some methodological points are made in terms of the writing of world history.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.15.246