检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陆晓萍[1]
出 处:《西昌学院学报(社会科学版)》2006年第1期133-135,共3页Journal of Xichang University:Social Science Edition
摘 要:盗窃罪的客体要件一直未引起我国学界的太多关注,本文以两个具体案例为切入口,在评析外国相关理论的基础上,运用民法中的有关理论,指出我国传统理论的缺失,提出以占有事实状态为盗窃罪的客体要件的主张,并对“新占有说”与“混合说”提出质疑。The academic kingdom of our country pays less attention to the objective condition of the traditional larceny all the time. This paper, taking two detailed cases and using the concerned theory in the civil law, points out the disadvantages of the traditional theory in our country, proposes the opinion about the objective condition of the larceny that the true condition is based on possession, and the doubts on "the new theory of possession" and "the theory of the mixture" .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145