检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心 [2]漯河职业技术学院,河南漯河462002
出 处:《河南大学学报(自然科学版)》2006年第3期63-67,共5页Journal of Henan University:Natural Science
基 金:河南大学黄河文明与可持续发展研究中心项目(YRCSD05-A-17);河南大学自然科学基础研究项目(04YBRW025)
摘 要:通过对“网上游河南”(www.uhenan.net/xingxiang/csly/index.htm)推介的河南省各市域旅游景点的整理,得出全省18个市域共120项精品旅游资源作为评价对象.按照《中国旅游资源普查规范》的技术路线和旅游资源分类、分级系统修订方案(1997版)的具体方法,确定每一项旅游资源的类别和级别.通过对专家打分结果的处理和计算,得出河南省旅游资源的类型结构和空间结构.最后探讨了这种定量评价方法应该改进的地方.The author chooses 120 tourism resources from 18 cities in Henan province as quantitatively evaluative objects from the web page of " http: www. uhenan, net/xingxiang/csly/index, htm". In accordance with the technical course of the Criterion of General Investigation of Tourism Resources of 1993's version and the concrete method of the Revised Plan of Grading and Classifying Tourism Resources of 1997's version, each tourism resource is classified and graded. The typal and spatial structures of tourism resources are obtained according to the calculating outcome of the marks given by tourism experts. In the end of this paper, it is pointed out that there ane three aspects to be improved in both quantitatively evaluative methods of 1993 and 1997 such as logistic flaws in the comparative methods, insufficient comparability in different types and the misguidance of average value of tourism resources
关 键 词:旅游资源 定量评价 中国旅游资源普查规范 河南省
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.151.234