多重视野下的农民经济行为研究  

Analysis on Peasants' Economic Behavior Based on Varied Viewpoints

作　　者：邓万春[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉理工大学政治与行政学院,湖北武汉430063

出　　处：《锦州医学院学报（社会科学版）》2006年第1期97-100,共4页Journal of Jinzhou Medical College:Social Science Edition

摘　　要：以韦伯、波耶克为代表的农民行为非理性说,以舒尔茨、波普金为代表的农民行为理性说,以恰亚诺夫、博兰尼、斯科特为代表的农民生存经济或道德经济说,都是研究特定情境和特定时代的农民的产物。各派的观点都不是普适的,都是具体的、有条件的。把这些有条件的观点普遍化,在一般意义上谈论农民行为的理性与非理性,是造成各派纷争的主要原因。在对中国农民经济行为的研究中,黄宗智的“过密化”观点,郭于华、郑风田等人的制度理性或条件理性说,是对农民经济行为研究的突破,但又都不无遗憾。Peasants behavior-irrational theory represented by Weber and Boeke, peasants behavior-rational theory represented by Schultz and Popkin, peasants＇ subsistence economy or moral economy theory represented by Chayanovan, Scott and Polanyi, are all the results of researching peasants under given conditions and times. These theories are all concrete and conditional. Generalizing these specific ideas and comprehending peasants＇ behavior in general sense expounds the debates between these theories. Of researches on Chinese peasants economic behavior, major breakthrough is made by ＂involution＂ idea of Huang Zongzhi, institution ration or condition ration theory of Guo Yuhua, Zheng Fengtian. However, regrets still exist.

关 键 词：农民 经济行为 理性 非理性 生存经济 过密化 

分 类 号：F061.4[经济管理—政治经济学]